Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Sapphire HD 4890 Atomic Edition Review

ccokeman    -   May 3, 2009
» Discuss this article (13)

Testing:

Featuring all-new game tests, this benchmark is for use with Vista-based systems. "There are two all-new CPU tests that have been designed around a new 'Physics and Artificial Intelligence-related computation.' CPU test two offers support for physics related hardware." There are four preset levels that correspond to specific resolutions. 'Entry' is 1024x768 progressing to 'Extreme' at 1920x1200. Of course, each preset can be modified to arrange any number of user designed testing. For our testing, I will use the four presets at all default settings.

 Settings:

  • Settings (each preset): Default
  • Entry: 1024x768
  • Performance: 1280x1024
  • High: 1680x1050
  • Extreme: 1920x1200
  • PhysX: Off

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The performance delivered by the Atomic HD 4890 is again well above that delivered by the stock example. Against the Nvidia offerings, it still falls short against the GTX 275 and GTX 285. However, it does come much closer and only falls to the GTX 285. While ATI seems to enjoy considerable success in 3DMark06, the same can't be said in 3DMark Vantage. Even with PhysX turned off in the Nvidia control panel, the Nvidia cards perform better in this test - but the gap is shrinking.

 




  1. Introduction & Closer Look
  2. Specifications & Features
  3. Testing (Setup & Overclocking)
  4. Testing: Far Cry 2
  5. Testing: Crysis Warhead
  6. Testing: BioShock
  7. Testing: Call of Duty: World at War
  8. Testing: Dead Space
  9. Testing: Fallout 3
  10. Testing: Left 4 Dead
  11. Testing: 3DMark06 Professional
  12. Testing: 3DMark Vantage
  13. Conclusion
Random Pic
© 2001-2014 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0328869820