Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Review

ccokeman    -   April 13, 2008
» Discuss this article (13)

Lowest Prices

Testing:

Sciencemark tests real world performance instead of using synthetic benchmarks. For this test, we ran the benchmark suite and will use the overall score for comparison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Higher is Better!

 

Cinebench is useful for testing your system, CPU and OpenGL capabilities using the software program CINEMA 4D. We will be using the default tests for this benchmark.

 

Higher is Better

 

HD Tune measures disk performance to make comparisons between drives or disk controllers.

 

Higher is Better

 

 

Lower is Better

 

Handily beating the Q6600 in these performance bechmarks was the expected result. Higher core clockspeeds and a higher front side bus should outperform a lower clocked processor. Drive performance shows little to no difference between processors.

 




  1. Introduction & Closer look
  2. Specifications & Features
  3. Testing (Setup & Overclocking)
  4. Testing (Apopysis & Winrar)
  5. Testing: SPECview, PCMark Vantage
  6. Testing: Sandra XII Professional
  7. Testing: Sciencemark, CineBench 10, HD Tune
  8. Testing: Crysis
  9. Testing: Knights of the Sea
  10. Testing: BioShock
  11. Testing: Call of Duty 4
  12. Testing: World In Conflict
  13. Testing: Call of Juarez
  14. Testing: Company of Heroes Opposing Fronts
  15. Testing: 3DMark06 Professional
  16. Conclusion:
Random Pic
© 2001-2014 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0297930241