Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Intel Core i5 750 Core i7 870 Review

ccokeman    -   September 7, 2009
» Discuss this article (83)

Testing:

ScienceMark tests real world performance instead of using synthetic benchmarks. For this test, we ran the benchmark suite and will use the overall score for comparison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

Higher is Better!

 

CineBench is useful for testing your system, CPU and OpenGL capabilities using the software program CINEMA 4D. We will be using the default tests for this benchmark.

 

Higher is Better

 

HD Tune measures disk performance to make comparisons between drives or disk controllers.

 

Higher is Better

 

 

Lower is Better

 

Sciencemark is very processor speed dependent and the results bare this out. When the 750 and 870 are overclocked the performance sky-rockets in both Sciencemark and Cinebench. Cinebench does not have a problem with speed dependency although it does help. However the newest socket 1156 processors are shown in a much more positive light. In Cinebench there is no contest. In HD Tune the burst speeds, avg read speeds and access times are slower than those delivered by the X58 chipset based platform. The burst and average speeds are ahead of what AMD has to offer.




  1. Introduction & Closer Look
  2. Closer Look (Continued)
  3. Specifications & Features
  4. Testing: Setup & Overclocking
  5. Testing: Apophysis, WinRar
  6. Testing: Office 2007, PcMark Vantage
  7. Testing: SiSoft Sandra 2009
  8. Testing: Sciencemark, Cinebench 10, HD Tune
  9. Testing: Far Cry 2
  10. Testing: Crysis Warhead
  11. Testing: BioShock
  12. Testing: Call of Duty World at War
  13. Testing: Dead Space
  14. Testing: Fallout 3
  15. Testing: Left 4 Dead
  16. Testing: 3DMark 06
  17. Testing: 3DMark Vantage
  18. Conclusion
Random Pic
© 2001-2014 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0381779671