Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

G.Skill RipJaws 4 16GB 2800MHz Review

   -   
» Discuss this article (0)

Lowest Prices

G.Skill RipJaws 4 16GB 2800MHz: Testing

Memory is often hard to separate from one kit to another in gaming, but when it comes to number crunching and computing, some memory provides an extra boost in comparison. To see just what kind of performance this kit has to offer, I will be running the modules through a series of benches to see just how they compare. SInce I only have a pair of DDR4 modules these will represent the comparison field. Each kit will be tested at its native native speeds, as well as overclocked. Overclocking of course will be dependent on exactly how far the testing rig will allow, but I'll push it as far as I can. The testing setup used for these benchmarks is listed below with the XMP profile applied to show where the modules settle in at after training. The CPU will be run with default XMP settings for baseline testing and bumped up to 4.6GHz for OC testing, or as close as possible to that speed. All current updates and patches are installed for Windows 7 Professional 64-bit and the latest driver for the NVIDIA GTX 770 will be used.

 

Testing Setup: Intel Socket 2011 V-3

Comparison Modules:

  • Corsair Vengeance LPX  2800MHz 16-18-18-36 1.2v

 

CPU-Z: This application visually shows the settings that we have chosen in the BIOS. Items shown in this application include CPU speed and bus settings, motherboard manufacturer, BIOS revisions, memory timings, and SPD chip information.

CPU-Z

 

Task Manager: We use this utility to show physical memory, kernel memory, page file, and processor usage.

Task Manager

 

Overclocking:

Overclocking on Intel Haswell processors is quite a bit different from what we are used to in the last few generations, where the CPU clock speeds did not influence the clock speed the memory controller could handle. Entry to Haswell memory overclocking 101 shows that while the CPU may handle a nice overclock of up 4.7GHz to 5.0GHz on really impressive examples, the memory may not scale up past 1866MHz or 2133MHz at those CPU clock speeds, even though the memory modules are rated much higher. It has to do with how the memory controller scales as CPU clock speed rises. This is nothing new and is just one of another obstacles to overcome when tuning your system for the best performance.

Setting the XMP 2.0 profile on the ASUS X99 Deluxe automatically sets the gear ratio to the 125MHz step when using modules that are rated at higher than 2400MHz. By doing so, it allows the board to boot and train the modules settings without the memory controller being an obstacle to a successful boot cycle. Using the 125MHz gear ratio, the memory efficiency scoring was down much lower than when using the 100MHz gear ratio, but with these modules I needed to use the 125MHz gear ratio to get up an over 3000MHz. After playing with the Corsair comparison modules my expectation for these modules was that I would reach similar clock speeds using the same methods. However at 16-16-16-30 I was only able to reach 3070MHz. That is still 270MHz over the advertised speed bin, or close to a 10% boost in speed for the trouble. Combined with the CPU overclock, the modules do improve performance in the tests that are sensitive to memory bandwidth.

 

 

Maximum Memory Speed:

The maximum memory speed for each set of overclocked modules is indicative of how well the modules ran on this test system. As such, your results may differ in either a positive or negative way based on the capabilities of your hardware. In other words, your mileage may vary!

 

The benchmarks used in this review include the following:

Benchmarks:

  • PCMark 8
  • Geekbench 3
  • Hyper Pi 0.99
  • SiSoft Sandra 2014
  • X.264 5.1
  • AIDA64
  • Metro: Last Light



Related Products
Random Pic
© 2001-2017 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy
Elapsed: 0.0704081059   (xlweb1)