Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

AMD Athlon II X3 435 & Athlon II X2 240e Processor Review

ajmatson    -   October 19, 2009
» Discuss this article (5)

Lowest Prices

Testing:

ScienceMark tests real world performance instead of using synthetic benchmarks. For this test, we ran the benchmark suite and will use the overall score for comparison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

Higher is Better!

 

CineBench is useful for testing your system, CPU, and OpenGL capabilities using the software program CINEMA 4D. We will be using the default tests for this benchmark.

 

Higher is Better

 

HD Tune measures disk performance to make comparisons between drives or disk controllers.

 

Higher is Better

 

 

Lower is Better

 

In Sciencemark, the X3 and the X2 overtook both the X4 processor and the i5. For the single core Cinebench test, the Athlon II X3 and X2 performed better than the Quad Core Athlon II, but fell back when all cores were brought into the mix. For HD Tune, the results were mixed with each being strong in one category and not another.




  1. Introduction & Closer Look
  2. Specifications & Features
  3. Testing: Setup & Overclocking
  4. Testing: Apophysis, WinRar
  5. Testing: Office 2007, POV Ray 3.7, PcMark Vantage
  6. Testing: SiSoft Sandra 2009
  7. Testing: Sciencemark, Cinebench 10, HD Tune
  8. Testing: Far Cry 2
  9. Testing: Crysis Warhead
  10. Testing: BioShock
  11. Testing: Call of Duty World at War
  12. Testing: Dead Space
  13. Testing: Fallout 3
  14. Testing: Left 4 Dead
  15. Testing: 3DMark 06
  16. Testing: 3DMark Vantage
  17. Conclusion
Random Pic
© 2001-2014 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0251538754