Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Abit IX38 Quad GT Review

ccokeman    -   December 26, 2007
» Discuss this article (5)

Lowest Prices

Testing:

Sciencemark tests real world performance instead of using synthetic benchmarks. For this test, we ran the benchmark suite and will use the overall score for comparison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Higher is Better!

 

Cinebench is useful for testing your system, CPU and OpenGL capabilities using the software program CINEMA 4D. We will be using the default tests for this benchmark.

 

Higher is Better

 

HD Tune measures disk performance to make comparisons between drives or disk controllers.

 

Higher is Better

 

 

Lower is Better

 

In Cinebench, the IX38 pulled ahead on both measures. The Abit X38 solution finished above the Asus X38 solution in three out of the four tests in HDTune. In Sciencemark, the Abit edged ahead of the Asus offerings. To summerize the results of the system benchmarks, the Abit IX38 Quad GT took twenty-four of thirty-five benchmark tests. Which means that in over seventy percent of the tests, the Abit was the higher performer. Pretty impressive!

 




  1. Introduction & Closer Look
  2. Closer Look (The Motherboard)
  3. Closer Look( Motherboard Continued)
  4. Installation
  5. Closer Look (The Bios)
  6. Closer Look (The Bios Continued)
  7. Configuration (Drivers, uGuru)
  8. Specifications & Features
  9. Testing: Setup and Overclocking
  10. Testing: Apophysis, WinRar
  11. Testing: Specview 10, PCMark Vantage
  12. Testing: Sandra XII
  13. Testing: Sciencemark, Cinebench, HDTune
  14. Testing: Crysis
  15. Testing: Knights of the Sea
  16. Testing: BioShock
  17. Testing: Call of Duty 4
  18. Testing: World in Conflict
  19. Testing: Call of Jaurez
  20. Testing: 3D Mark 06 Professional
  21. Conclusion
Random Pic
© 2001-2014 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0287060738