Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Platinum May Need Replacing as a Catalyst

Category: Science & Technology
Posted: July 17, 2012 07:27AM
Author: Guest_Jim_*

For a long time platinum has been used as a catalyst for a variety of reactions. This is because it works for these different reactions and works reasonably well, but researchers have been looking for a replacement to the metal because of how expensive it is. Now researchers at Case Western Reserve University are suggesting that platinum needs to be replaced not just to bring down costs, but because it is holding back the efficiency of reactions.

Traditionally researchers have believed the reason platinum catalysts have not achieved the maximum theoretical efficiency is because of impurities on their surfaces. The Case researchers call this surface-poisoning explanation "lame" and describe it as a result of improperly using a statistical tool for comparing catalysts. When they did their own tests with platinum at the cathode of a fuel cell, the researchers found it was producing only 0.93 V instead of the theoretical maximum 1.23 V.

Though the researchers' analysis of platinum has been published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and in Electrocatalysis, they can offer no better catalyst at this time. Copper laccase, a catalyst found in trees and fungi, should be able to produce more voltage according to the researchers' work, but is unstable, which makes it unusable as a catalyst at this time. Hopefully something with the performance of copper laccase and stability of platinum can be found.



Register as a member to subscribe comments.
Waco on July 17, 2012 08:34AM
I kept trying to think about this in car terms when reading it (as in catalytic converters). I failed. :P
airman on July 17, 2012 09:23AM
Haha same here, but the end of paragraph 2 clued me in lol - Oh yeah, they used platinum for electrodes for fuel cells :P Also I saw that after clicking the news article's link, it's entitled "Platinum is the wrong stuff for fuel cells", lol
Waco on July 17, 2012 09:24AM
Now that makes more sense. I fail at reading early in the morning. :)
Guest_Jim_* on July 17, 2012 10:16AM
Sorry about that guys, but how is 11:34AM early in the morning Waco?
Waco on July 17, 2012 02:23PM
Either the server time is off of my internal clock is. :P

This news has comment postings disabled because it is now archived.

© 2001-2013 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy

Also part of our network: TalkAndroid, Android Forum, iPhone Informer, Neoseeker, and Used Audio Classifieds

Elapsed: 0.0375120640