Welcome Stranger to OCC!Login | Register

Why XCOM is a Shooter and Not an RTS

Category: Gaming
Posted: 10:48PM

Maybe you're an old-school gamer and have fond memories of the XCOM series. Perhaps you've simply just heard the names or people talk fondly of the series. The XCOM games are, arguably, one of the better real-time stratey games you could get, even with its age. 2K Games is reviving the franchise, but it won't be returning as an RTS game, but rather a first-person shooter. 2K doesn't want to label it as an FPS, but the game is basically one. Sure, the new XCOM has some tactical elements to it, but it is still a shooter. The reason behind the move from RTS to FPS is, according to 2K, because gamers don't want an RTS and in fact, RTS games are no longer contemporary. Maybe 2K has never heard of StarCraft 2 or the Dawn of War series, but it seems those games aren't contemporary. I have a different opinion on the matter, but 2K Games seems to think that XCOM should be a shooter since that is what everyone wants. What do you guys think?

Register as a member to subscribe comments.
Guest comment
ges hoo on July 12, 2011 11:08PM
anyone remember something called xcom: enforcer? wasn't that a fps attempt in the xcom series? don't remember it? enough said about xcom being a fps then.
Locutus on July 13, 2011 03:58AM
TBH, I don't really like the RTS genre. It's like playing speed chess with guns.
That_Guy on July 14, 2011 04:43AM
Make another XCOM just like the first original one. Screw everyone who want an FPS. Go play Crysis or whatever. XCOM is a turn-based strategy, ok i'll go for an RTS (XCOM3 was kinda fun with the ability to switch from turn-based to real time).

This news has comment postings disabled because it is now archived.

© 2001-2018 Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy
Elapsed: 0.0589179993   (xlweb1)